Victor Vizcaino arrested (first arrest of a blogger Ecuador) # presoporopinar remember a conversation with my friend illiteracy where he said that the persecution of bloggers Ecuador was underway and that there would aim to Victor Vizcaino. I was right. Yesterday, May 3, 2010, Mr. Vizcaino was arrested in a SWAT-like OS, according to preliminary news published in daily El Comercio, was transferred to Quito. The reason: a post he allegedly published by offending the nation's fiscal Mr. Washington Pesantes. First of all, Mr. Pesantes and other lawyers. You are required to prove that he wrote the article was mr. Vizcaíno. As far as I know, anyone with access to key site "laplegariadeunpagano.com may publish under the pseudonym of" Victor Vizcaino, because, whether they know gentlemen, blogging is signed with pseudonyms. is like the case of this blog where the posts, most are signed by one Varth Deity imaginary character without an identity card or citizenship. Anyone who knows the key to this blog could post published texts which would come with that pseudonym. not personally know the sr. Vizcaino, but I can not but protest this abuse due to ignorance in technology for those who, instead of pursuing real criminals who are in distress Ecuadorian society, dedicated to pursuing those who they claim have offended her majesty. Note: This post was written by Varth no deity but by someone who used the key to this blog to display their anger.
Reflections 2011 pre-referendum At times I go to speak to you (the few who still believe that I read. By the way, soon return to the rotation of the opinion blogger, stay tuned) to present a few of my thoughts previous the referendum of May 7, 2011. government's dirty campaign (Correa) and his opponents This and any other government can do consultations that shit they want. Also, according to the current constitution, any citizen can call a referendum being subject to the respective conditions. What I think is dirty, disgusting, vile, shameless is to try to induce respondents to make a decision. When I consult something is to give me an answer, favorable or not, and I stick to that answer. What sense does it look something compelling or encouraging my office I respond to what I hear? For me, it should be imperative to include a clear prohibition to campaign in a referendum. The only allowable would release the contents of the questions. Well, some say, "but the corrupt media, disguising the intention of spreading the questions, could perform analysis to tip the balance somewhere." That would be the only risk but it seems more ethical than empty propaganda bombing of CHUCHO NO VOTE, BECAUSE IF If you vote yes or vote VERGA WALLIS AND DO NOT BE GAY; addition, the government has its ways spread their "bias" but again, it is more ethical to advertise directly to an option. Consultations must be for things simple, nontechnical By God! Who the hell would think to ask Juan Tragedy, country man, barely able to read and write, on legal reform with a highly technical text? Man vote YES or NO as you are told. If the man is a person who receives GOVERNMENT BOND, THE GOVERNMENT UREA, Government House and someone tells you to VOTE NO VOTE AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT, how do you think will vote? Correa has used this request as an outlet for her people "to answer" and would "give permission" to do things which do not have the guts to execute the task on their own (and do not want to be told "dictator", this time with true causal). Through consultation, Correa, as did Pontius Pilate washing his hands and say "you asked for reforms." Why not ask if we want the vote no longer be compulsory for everyone? Final Reflections: The feint of presumptive winner NO linebackers to say that NO will win: VALEN VERGA! Declared the winner before the votes is like committing suicide: the undecided voters who have some sympathy with the government are likely to be convinced to vote for the SI and they can flip tortilla. SI For supporters who say that the SI will win: WELL WORTH VERGA! Although this insult is free. I am convinced that if he wins all the questions but in a few cantons (perhaps counted on the fingers of one hand), some questions get the opposite response. Thus, I predict that in Guayaquil, on the question of the casinos win NO and Quito in the question of the bulls, mostly win NO. For my part, I will vote only if the first question and no to others. You , vote as fuck like but as Miche says, if they know how to vote, the better vote NO.
A great time at Lola by God Last night, after being in The Abacería , encamminamos San Matías and arrived at Lola by God (which you already have a scan on the blog, which otherwise is the most visited post.)
We attended once, and after a chat with the bartender (I forgot to ask his name for the good treatment), we recommended two wines, a Clos Severi Priory (red) and a Don Condado de Huelva (white semi-sweet for me).
We sat at a table, who happened to be his free ... we were lucky.
not go out in the pictures ... but accompanied by strips of eggplant fried with honey.
In the second round, the wines we tried were, in my case, a Clos Severi and my companion a BO2, originating in the mountains of the Contraviesa, more precisely in Cadiar.
On this occasion were as you see two red ...
... who were accompanied (and this time if there is representation of both) by a cap consisting of the pipirrana algosimilar with octopus and mussels, but the truth, was very good and it tasted a little.
hunger pressed And ... decided to have something ... and we opted for breaded chicken strips, you see down here, and were accompanied by two sauces.
also were invited to see the flamenco show they have every Sunday night for free to all customers. Highlight
treatment, efficient and friendly, and also the fact that we were invited to the first round, and although we could not chat with Eva, we thank the treatment received by both she and her people both in person and the group facebook.
